Ruthless Knitting

a knitter’s journal
« Proper Storage
On Productivity »

Wishing Didn’t Make It So

Gather ’round for a tale of knitting gone awry.

It all started more than a year ago, when my good friend Rebecca sent me an e-mail link to a garment at an online shop known for its beautiful knitwear, along with the question, "We could knit this, couldn’t we?" The garment in question was a pullover sweater with very short sleeves, a deep U-neck, and a full skirt. The zoomed-in views available on the website revealed that the bodice was knit side-to-side in stockinette with purled rows every inch or so, while the skirt portion seemed to have been picked up from the bodice and knit straight downward. "Sure," I told Rebecca, "we could totally knit that." But we didn’t — at least, not right away.

The top stayed in the back of my mind for a year or so, until last month I got a cold and wanted to work on something that involved larger yarn, interesting construction, and plain knitting. I pulled out some yarn from Gryphon that had been in my stash for a while and set to work on a knockoff of the top Rebecca had introduced me to.

gryphon3.JPG

The bodice portion went quite well, all things considered. I worked a tubular cast-on to create what would be the edge of the right sleeve, made a 1×1 rib edging, increased for a few inches to the full sleeve length and width, and then did a provisional cast on for the front and back stitches on either side of the sleeve. I worked straight for four inches or so, bound off the stitches for the right side of the neck, worked just the front to the far side of the neck, went back and worked the back across to match, cast stitches back on for the left side of the neck, rejoined and knit for another four inches, put all but the left sleeve stitches on holders, made the left sleeve to match the right, and worked a tubular bind-off. (Whew! Did you follow that?) I grafted both sides together and seamed under the arms, made a strip of 1×1 ribbing for the neckline and sewed it in, and sat back to admire my handiwork.

So far, so good. The only problem was that I was clearly going to run out of yarn.

Now, I knew when I started this top that I didn’t have enough yarn, but I sort of hoped that I miraculously would have enough, somehow. The yarn I used has 280 yards per skein, and I had two skeins. Last time I used the yarn, I was amazed how far 280 yards would go, so I crossed my fingers that it would do the trick. But the bodice itself used up about two-thirds of the yarn, so there was simply no way I would be able to knit the skirt-like portion with what remained.

I could have ripped the whole thing out at this point, and maybe I should have. But I knew that if I did, I would never reknit the top, and it would probably be a very long time before I reused the yarn. Also, I had a cold, and I didn’t want to have to think too hard about anything. So I just pressed on, and when I ran out of orange yarn after about four inches, I changed to some blue yarn of the same type.

gryphon2.JPG

When I ran out of blue yarn at about eight inches, the skirt part still wasn’t long enough, but I had a plan, so I changed to yellow yarn of the same type and continued. Finally, when I was almost out of yellow yarn, I worked a few rows of ribbing and bound off.

gryphon1.JPG

At this point, the top looked like something a clown might wear. Individually, the orange, blue, and yellow yarns were lovely, but together, they were frightful. I had a plan, though: I had already decided to dye the whole thing black. So that is what I did. Then I blocked it, dried it, and tried it on. 

The result was rather disappointing. So disappointing, in fact, that I wasn’t able to bring myself to look at the top again or write about it for a few days, and then I drafted this post and avoided taking pictures of myself in the top for ten days, leaving me unable to complete the post. Then I took the pictures and left the draft post unfinished for another week or so. Clearly, I just haven’t been ready to think about it.

After all that stalling, here, at last, are the pictures. They are not terribly good pictures, but they are as good as they’re going to get.

derivative2.JPG

derivative1.JPG

The sad truth is that the skirt is too wide, resulting in more gathering than I would like. That would not be so bad, except the way that the neckline pulls in and the bust pushes out makes the front of the skirt ride quite a bit higher than the back of the skirt, and I don’t like the result. It would almost make a cute maternity top, except that even if that had been my intention, the height discrepancy between the front and the back would be a problem.

What I need to do, I suppose, is rip the skirt back and reknit it with smaller needles. (I don’t think I need fewer stitches, I just need to stick with size 9 needles instead of increasing up to size 11). What I’m not so sure about is the high front / low back issue — I could use short rows to remedy that, but I dread the very idea of having to work out the math. Perhaps short rows won’t be necessary if the skirt itself is not so dang voluminous. I don’t know. What do you think?

At the moment, the project has been sitting in my sweater chest, and I’m pretty content to leave it there.

This entry was posted on Friday, April 18th, 2008 at 7:56 am and is filed under Design, Projects in Progress. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

9 Responses to “Wishing Didn’t Make It So”

  1. desiknitter Says:
    April 18th, 2008 at 8:36 am

    Oh no! I’m so sorry it turned out this way - your expression gives away your irritation at it all. Even though I don’t think it looks that bad, really, you’re right about the puckering. Right now I think it’s best if it stays in a time out in the closet, because no matter what you do to it you’re going to be annoyed, no?

    But I think the maternity-top-with-short-rows is a good idea (maybe in the fall, after some months have passed:-)) - the maths is not that difficult. You might not even have to reknit the whole skirt. Maybe this will help:

    Figure out what the height difference between front and back will be; Multiply that length by your row gauge; you have the number of rows in which to fit the short rows.
    Divide that number by half, and you have the number of wraps.
    Subtract your bust-point to bust-point measurement from the length of the front; say it’s 19-9 = 10 inches.
    Divide by 2 = 5 inches. Your wraps will be fitted into 5 inches on both edges of the front.
    Divide 5 by your stitch gauge. This will tell you how many stitches apart to keep the wraps.
    Start the short rows at the beginning of the RS.
    All this I just learnt from Maggie Righetti!!

  2. eSSKnits Says:
    April 18th, 2008 at 11:19 am

    Whatever said, you know what? I kinda like it. And I think it gives a young look.
    Anyways, if you are so disappointed, why not frog the skirt and make it again?

  3. Susan B Says:
    April 18th, 2008 at 11:39 am

    Well, I kinda’ see what you mean. But it has major major major potential, that’s for certain!

    It might be interesting to take the sweater as a base and let the design group loose on it - see all of the different variations and changes that they would make - even if it were only sketched out on paper!

  4. Joanna Says:
    April 18th, 2008 at 12:40 pm

    Hmm… it seems to me like part of the problem is that the skirt sort of balloons out right where it meets the bodice. Because of this, the ruffle-y effect of the wide skirt causes the bottom of the bodice to ruffle and pucker as well. What if you picked up stitches for the skirt and worked a few inches straight, keeping the width the same as in the bodice, and then gradually increased stitches so the transition to the flared section wouldn’t be so harsh? (Unless that’s what you did the first time around, in which case… I got nothing.) Also, I like each of your colors individually, but I was very happy to get to the bottom of the post and see that you didn’t go for the clown look after all… :)

  5. Gwendolyn's mom Says:
    April 18th, 2008 at 1:30 pm

    Well, speaking as an expert on maternity tops, I think it is pretty cute. Is the front longer than the back? B/c that’s what you’re looking for in maternity tops– longer fronts.* Sorry that my suggestion led you to unhappiness. On my end, of course, I didn’t even attempt it!

    *Note: this is not a veiled attempt to acquire the top myself, unless, of course, you want it to be. :)

  6. Wanda Says:
    April 20th, 2008 at 2:27 pm

    Hmm, that’s definitely a knitting tale. Sorry it didn’t turn out. I don’t really have any suggestions for you. I’m not really keen on the end result, but the initial top sounds like something that might not be my preference either way.

  7. Ingrid Says:
    April 22nd, 2008 at 6:33 pm

    I like the top. There are lots of tops with similar shaping in the shops at the moment (even when I was in Paris). I think that it might suit someone who has “tummy issues” (even if not pregnant).

  8. Mishka Says:
    April 23rd, 2008 at 3:00 pm

    I’m just seeing this from London, so I’m late commenting. I agree with others that it has potential, but I’m not sure I agree with you about going to a smaller needle on the skirt, because that will give it less drape. I think Joanna’s right that you should consider starting with fewer stitches and increasing more gradually. If you can give the skirt a better shape so it looks less ‘pregnant,’ the difference in the length might not be a problem. But is it sitting back on your shoulders like that because the back neck is built up too much? Hmm. What an interesting design challenge!! (Alternatively, don’t forget that you can just leave it in the sweater chest until you need some black yarn. It’s only knitting after all!)

  9. mel Says:
    April 23rd, 2008 at 6:50 pm

    I’m impressed with your tenacity! And I think I can ’see’ the intent in my head - very cute. Maybe a more A-line shape would work better? I wonder if the stitch pattern at the top doesn’t also encourage the ruffling with the purl row pulling in (though it doesn’t look to be pulling in too much). Your face in that first shot is killing me - it says as much as your words do about how you feel with this one!

Leave a Reply

- Why ask? This confirms you are a human user!

Print Post